Ever since I stumbled on the secret to Bessler's wheel, more than two years ago now, I have been trying turn it to my advantage, but knowing the basic concept and finding ways of using it are two different things. Gradually, through trial and error and through occasional sudden revelations in connection with Bessler's clues, I think I am on the brink of success. I noted down a brief description of the principle I discovered and jumbled up the letters and it has appeared under almost every blog since then.
I know there are many, probably 90 per cent, who think I'm suffering from premature perpetuation, (don't you just love that phrase! I owe that one to Stewart of Besslerwheel forum fame.) but I am sure that when you know the principle you will share my enthusiasm. The reason for this blog, is that I often get asked for more information on what I have discovered and I am hard put to reveal any of it in case I let slip too much information. However there is a clue I can give albeit a vague one.
I am sure that this same principle will be available for another mechanical enigma which has entertained and puzzled us for many years. I refer to the inertial thrust or propulsion engine, also known as reactionless drive. I believe I'm right in saying that to date, no reactionless drive has ever been validated under properly controlled conditions.
The name derives from Newton's third law, which is usually expressed as, "for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction." The Gyroscopic Inertial Thruster amongst other proposed sensible concepts have been researched but so far without success.
Without giving too much away I am convinced that the principle I have found will also be a significant inclusion in the configuration of any successful inertial thruster. This means that there may be a reactionless space drive for the future and of course there is potential for ground a sea transport too.
When you consider it, if Bessler's wheel worked as we all believe it did, then what ever mechanical arrangement inside it must be transferable to an Inertial Drive Engine because in order for it to work Bessler's wheel must have overcome Newton's third law:- "for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction."
JC
I know there are many, probably 90 per cent, who think I'm suffering from premature perpetuation, (don't you just love that phrase! I owe that one to Stewart of Besslerwheel forum fame.) but I am sure that when you know the principle you will share my enthusiasm. The reason for this blog, is that I often get asked for more information on what I have discovered and I am hard put to reveal any of it in case I let slip too much information. However there is a clue I can give albeit a vague one.
I am sure that this same principle will be available for another mechanical enigma which has entertained and puzzled us for many years. I refer to the inertial thrust or propulsion engine, also known as reactionless drive. I believe I'm right in saying that to date, no reactionless drive has ever been validated under properly controlled conditions.
The name derives from Newton's third law, which is usually expressed as, "for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction." The Gyroscopic Inertial Thruster amongst other proposed sensible concepts have been researched but so far without success.
Without giving too much away I am convinced that the principle I have found will also be a significant inclusion in the configuration of any successful inertial thruster. This means that there may be a reactionless space drive for the future and of course there is potential for ground a sea transport too.
When you consider it, if Bessler's wheel worked as we all believe it did, then what ever mechanical arrangement inside it must be transferable to an Inertial Drive Engine because in order for it to work Bessler's wheel must have overcome Newton's third law:- "for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction."
JC
10a2c5d26e15f6g7h10ik12l3m6n14o14r5s17tu6v5w4y4-3,’.
