Why Is the Number Five so Prominent in Johann Bessler’s Work.n

It seems as though no one shares my opinion that Bessler’s wheel required five mechanisms and yet Bessler did his utmost to point out the importance of the number five.  He embedded it in his name and in codes throughout his books, but also in his drawings. 

This blog was originally posted in October 2011 - almost 14 years ago - and nothing’s changed!  No sign of a successful model of Bessler’s wheel yet, not by me nor anyone else.  Isn’t it time people began to accept that at least five mechanisms were  necessary for successful build?

What of my own builds?  I’m so confident that my design is the same as Bessler’s that I’d put money on it, but I’m not rich enough yet to gamble.

Returning to my old post:-

I have indicated the presence of a pentagon embedded within the two drawings of the Merseburg and Weissenstein Castles many times over several years. It has been pointed out to me that ‘any geometric figure could be revealed by someone else who might draw lines on that Merseburg wheel drawing and get a hexagon or an octagon out of it!’

I think that’s a reasonable comment, although I don’t think that has happened yet. But I can provide convincing evidence that the pentagon/pentagram was deliberately included by Bessler, and with no other geometric design intended in those particular drawings, maybe that would help to focus people’s minds on the reason why.

Back in November 2021 I published a blog entitled “The Toys page, 137, 141 and 47 and the Freemasons”. Amongst other things I talked about the 47th proposition of Euclid and the Pythagorean theorem. I did not offer a link to Euclid’s 11th proposition which I now do, it was in fact ....

“ To inscribe an equilateral and equiangular pentagon in a given circle….”

I’ve abridged it somewhat to simplify my point. A diameter line is first drawn across the circle, in our Weissenstein version it is that line I call the padlock line running downwards from point A.  See the second illustration on this page.

A second line is drawn from the upper end of the padlock line, point A,  to the opposite circumference, point C in Euclid’s construction below, forming an 18 degrees angle.  That one in the Weissenstein drawing I call the ‘rope line’

A third line is drawn from the same point, to the opposite circumference, point D in Euclid’s construction, again at an angle of 18 degrees but on the opposite side of the padlock line from the rope line.

A line is drawn between Points C and D.  Angle CAD is 36 degrees (2 times 18 degrees) and angles C and D are twice the angle at A, 72 degrees.

“Let ABCDE be the given circle.

Set out the isosceles triangle FGH having each of the angles at G and H double the angle at F.

Inscribe in the circle ABCDE the triangle ACD (blue) equiangular with the triangle FGH, so that the angles CAD, ACD, and CDA equal the angles at F, G, and H respectively. Therefore each of the angles ACD and CDA is also double the angle CAD.

 6m

Now bisect the angles ACD and CDA respectively by the straight lines CE and  DB, and join AB, BC, DE, and EA.

Then, since each of the angles ACD and CDA is double the angle CAD, and they are bisected by the straight lines CE and DB, therefore the five angles DAC, ACE, ECD,CDB, and BDA equal one another.

But equal angles stand on equal circumferences, therefore the five circumferences AB, BC, CD, DE, and EA equal one another.

But straight lines that cut off equal circumferences are equal, therefore the five straight lines AB, BC, CD, DE, and EA equal one another. Therefore the pentagon ABCDE is equilateral.

I say next that it is also equiangular.”

With thanks to http://aleph0.clarku.edu/~djoyce/elements/bookIV/propIV11.

What features of Euclid’s construction could be found in the two drawings being examined, and clearly identified as a clue to it being part of the pentagon, and nothing else?

This is the Weissenstein drawing with some existing lines coloured by me!

The blue line exists as the padlock line from A. Although it isn’t in this particular construction it is used in alternative constructions.

The red line is the rope line A to C.  These two are 18 degrees apart. This should spark the thought of a pentagon on its own.

The purple line A to D is also 18 degrees from the blue padlock line. These two angles total 36 degrees, another hint at the presence of a pentagon.

The yellow line C to D matches the green one and is aligned with the hatching lines in the wheel drawings.  Just in case you think that you B and E should also align with the hatching lines, you’re right they should, but I did not measure the bisected angles when I drew this with my mouse, so on the Weissenstein drawing my positioning was slightly out - but it doesn’t affect the conclusion.

The two white lines, DB and CE bisect the angles at ACD and ADC to provide the final two points of the pentagon.

Remember every single angle in the pentagram is a multiple of 18.  Hence there are these angles 18, 36, 54, 72, 90 and 108.  

Also the letter ‘R’ is the 18th letter of the alphabet.  It also forms a major part of Bessler’s logo and his initials, E for Ernst and Elias, the fifth letters, to become R through the ROT13 cipher.

To summarise. The two lines of interest in the Bessler wheel drawings are the rope line and the padlock line.  These two lines form the basis for suspecting the presence of the pentagon. They’re 18 degrees apart.

JC.  

Johann Bessler aka Orffyreus Showed Us His Secret.

I often repeat myself when I believe useful information that I’ve posted seems to be ignored. This stuff comes direct from Johann Bessler’s brain via his books and in my opinion it’s too important to ignore.  Bear in mind, Bessler told us he’d rather die than give away the details about his wheel.  Also there several hints about how his machine worked and where the information was hidden.  Assuming his claims were genuine how can anyone ignore this information?

I copied the following piece from a post I made on 14 September 2011, some 14 years ago!  I've hardly changed my opinion on my interpretation on the quote. I’ve repeated this information many times but still no one takes any notice.

“He will be called a great craftsman, 

who can easily/lightly throw a heavy thing high, 

 if one pound falls a quarter, 

it shoots four pounds, four quarters high.”

Firstly, the most obvious point is that if one pound falls a quarter and lifts another four pounds then we have a total of five pounds and those who are familiar with my work in decoding Bessler’s clues will at once recognise the presence of the ubiquitous number 5 again - which I have suggested refers to five mechanisms. 

Secondly, he tells us that there are five one pound weights (one plus four), but one of them is falling. Since one of the falling weights is one pound and the other four being lifted are also one pound each, all five of them are of equal mass - one pound each..”

I then erred and assumed there were ten weights, five pairs because of this next quote :-

 “... a work of this kind of craftsmanship has, as its basis of motion, many separate pieces of lead. These come in pairs, such that, as one of them takes up an outer position, the other takes up a position nearer the axle. Later, they swap places, and so they go on and on changing places all the time.” 

But I was wrong.  My current interpretation has changed a little from my early post. It goes like this:-

In the above quote the five weights operate in pairs.  As one falls it lifts the previous weight by means of a cord which passes around two pulleys.

But if  "..it shoots four pounds, four quarters high,” then you might think that either, one of the pounds is shot one quarter high, which is no big deal from a similar weight falling the same distance, or one pound shoots the other four pounds a quarter high, which is frankly impossible.

So one pound falls a quarter.  How do we define what he meant by a quarter? In this case he was referring to a clock - something he also included in the first drawings in both Grundlicher Bericht and Das Triumphirende  - it was embedded invisibly but it was easy to find and was an essential ingredient in deciphering other clues within the drawing.  A quarter of an hour or fifteen minutes covers 90 degrees.  But how could this single right angle fall cause “ four pounds to shoot upwards four quarters”? 

We saw in the first part that the word ‘quarter', referred to, not just 90 degrees but also to a clock.  In the second part the word ‘quarter' also refers to a clock but this time he has confused us by using the words ‘four quarters’. Four quarters equals one whole hour.  Each hour on a clock is divided into 30 degrees, so the words ‘four quarters’ meaning ‘one hour’ as used here equals thirty degrees.  To paraphrase Bessler’s words, “a great craftsman would be he who, as one pound falls 90 degrees, causes each of the other four pounds to shoot upwards 30 degrees.”  

It should be also be remembered that when the bi-directional Kassel wheel was started from a stand still it required only the smallest of pushes from two fingers for it to begin to accelerate, BUT it was also reported that rotation did not begin until a single weight was heard to fall, hence the phrase "...if one pound falls..." , meaning that it only takes one pound weight to fall for the whole wheel to begin to rotate and therefore cause the other weights to move.

This happened very quickly and this quick reaction has puzzled many people.  This is easily explained.  When the fallen weight, in its slightly advantageous position, fell, it lifted the previous fallen weight which had arrived at a disadvantageous point and was negating the small mechanical advantage of the falling weight.  Lifting the fallen weight just enough to neutralise any disadvantage gave the wheel in effect, two mechanical advantages simultaneously.

The energy gained comes from the falling weight, but energy expended to lift the fallen weight, is less because it doesn’t need to be lifted 90 degrees, it needs a lift of just 30 degrees. 

I should also add that a graphic of  the 30 degree lift is embedded in one of the drawings, but the clues have to recognised correctly and interpreted.  Having said that the method is ingenious and the result is unarguably correct.

As I said at the beginning of this post, people continue to ignore the evidence and are still struggling to work out how one pound could possibly lift four pounds.  

JC

Update on my Websites based on the Life of Johann Bessler aka Orffyreus

 In a few weeks I’m going to close down some of my websites, simply because they are becoming too expensive to maintain.  Costs have risen but also I am close to achieving my main aim which is to replicate Bessler’s wheel.  I regret having to remove the websites but they are almost redundant and everything detailed in them will be described in a book I’ve been writing … for ever it seems!

http://www.free-energy.co.uk/  This was my first ever website,  still going strong, since 1997!

www.besslerswheel.com will be completely rewritten, having video on the successful model.

http://www.theorffyreuscode.com/ will be updated to show some of the codes which explain the mechanisms.

http://www.orffyreus.net/  will be available in a limited version.

http://www.orffyreus.org/  will be available in a limited version.

https://www.gravitywheel.com/ will have full details of a working Bessler-Collins Wheel.

JC

50 Years Researching Bessler’s Wheel (Orffyreus’ Wheel)

 After more than fifty years studying the life of Johann Bessler aka Orffyreus, inventor of a gravity-enabled wheel, I find it remarkable that no one has realised the extraordinary implications of producing a machine that worked precisely as his machine did.  How it would affect the world we live in; this world of ours with its pollution, global warming, energy inefficiency, falling options to produce more cheaper forms of energy, etc. etc.

Over the years I have produced five books, four by Johann Bessler with full English translations, plus one by me, a full biography of Bessler.  I included numerous documents to him, by him and about him.  I had eight web sites running at one time, each with different information on the subject. 

I’ve been running this blog for nine years, I’ve been interviewed by various radio stations both here in the U.K, as well as in the USA.  Italian TV flew me to Rome to take part in a documentary about a Bessler.  Articles about my research have appeared in Infinite Energy magazine and Omni magazine.  I’m well-known for my firmly held conviction that Johann Bessler built a genuine perpetual motion machine and exhibited it over many years in different town’s throughout Germany.

He demonstrated the machine to one of the most famous scientists of the day, Gottfried Leibniz who offered advice on how to exhibit his device and allow public tests designed to prove that it was genuine.  These tests were all added to the numerous exhibitions, but no sale resulted.

My point is that there is very credible evidence that Bessler’s claim was genuine and there is not a single piece of evidence against him. I fully understand the reasons given for its impossibility but given the overwhelmingly positive evidence for Bessler, the rest is an open road to a successful replication of Bessler’s free energy machine.

So why is it that no one is prepared too open their minds to the possibility that his machine could save this planet from all it’s apparent suicide aided and abetted by our so-called experts, scientists, teachers, nay-sayers, elitist politicians etc, etc.

There will be a gigantic reward for the person who finally succeeds in deciphering Bessler’s incredible collection of textual and graphic clues, codes and hints.  I’m sure there could be a Nobel prize for the one who does it.

Why haven’t I succeeded?  Well I think I will have succeeded if I’m allowed to live long enough.  I’m eighty years of age and I’ve found the secret and I’m building a replica which I’m convinced will mirror Bessler’s own configuration.

The five books are available from the top of the right hand panel where it says “Bessler’s Books”, and here’s a link https://johncollinsnews.blogspot.com/p/johann-besslers-books-and-biography.html

Those are digital copies, but you can get printed copies from 

http://www.lulu.com/spotlight/johncollins

If you need more convincing visit these web site that I have posted, maintained and updated since January 18th 1998!

http://www.free-energy.co.uk/   My original website still running.

http://www.orffyreus.org/          Info about Bessler’s unique windmill from which he fell to his death.

http://www.theorffyreuscode.com./  List of  interesting codes interpreted by me over the years.  These barely scratch the surface.  Search my blog for more.

http://www.besslerswheel.com/ More discussions about Bessler’s clues

https://www.gravitywheel.com/ My latest website which will have details of my new machine as soon as it’s finished.

Plus this blog of course!    https://johncollinsnews.blogspot.com/

JC