I noticed yet again the suggestion on the Besslerwheel forum that the reports that Bessler’s wheel was able to begin rotation as soon as the brake was released must be wrong because it was impossible for the wheel to be permanently out of balance. So - several points here.
The first thing to say is that all eyewitnesses described the first two wheels as beginning to rotate as soon as the brake was released. They accelerated up to their full speed of over 50 RPM. These first two wheels could only turn in one direction. People have suggested that perhaps Bessler stopped the wheel at a particular point in rotation so that as soon as it was released it would begin to spin.
Why would anyone think that? It was reported that many people were allowed to screw a bolt in and out to slow or stop the wheel as often as they wished and then allow it to spin up again, by loosening the bolt. Why was it thought that Bessler cheated to create the effect of spontaneous rotation? There are some who believe that it is impossible to design the wheel to spontaneously begin to spin and therefore Bessler was cheating, but the whole idea of a perpetual motion machine is said to be impossible so why focus on such a debatable detail for which there is no evidence?
If, as Bessler claimed, his wheel did begin to spin spontaneously upon the brake’s release, then of course he had to apply a brake otherwise it would have continued to spin until the bearings wore out. So there had to be a brake.
Let us now examine the matter a little more closely. In order to begin to spin as soon as the brake was released, the wheel must have been out of balance before the brake was released. So it had to be out of balance even when it was brought to a stop, which of course it had to be otherwise the brake would not have been needed. It was out of balance when it was allowed to start, and it was out of balance when it was forcibly stopped, therefore it was therefore permanently out of balance.
For this condition to be present the weight which fell and overbalanced the wheel, must have also reversed the action of the preceding weight. In other words it created a condition of imbalance when it fell, thus prolonging the overbalancing effect permanently.
Although the chances of creating a mechanism which effectively achieve the action described in the paragraph above, seem vanishingly small after 300 years of trying, I am confident that this solution will be found. I can’t say unequivocally that it has been found because I don’t have a working model yet, but I am aware of the specific Bessler clues which demonstrate how Bessler did it.
One more thing; the mechanism was described as simple, well it may look simple to understand, but it isn’t so easy to build. Each mechanism, of which there five - and there is no doubt about that - consists of ten separate pieces metal, plus two weights. There are no springs and there is nothing odd about the weights, so I think the weights which Bessler allowed to be examined were wrapped a handkerchief for two reasons, firstly they were greasy and secondly it added to the mystique surrounding the whole event. Mine are simple lead discs with a hole through the centre. I can put several on one bolt to produce the desired weight.
JC
For this condition to be present the weight which fell and overbalanced the wheel, must have also reversed the action of the preceding weight. In other words it created a condition of imbalance when it fell, thus prolonging the overbalancing effect permanently.
Although the chances of creating a mechanism which effectively achieve the action described in the paragraph above, seem vanishingly small after 300 years of trying, I am confident that this solution will be found. I can’t say unequivocally that it has been found because I don’t have a working model yet, but I am aware of the specific Bessler clues which demonstrate how Bessler did it.
One more thing; the mechanism was described as simple, well it may look simple to understand, but it isn’t so easy to build. Each mechanism, of which there five - and there is no doubt about that - consists of ten separate pieces metal, plus two weights. There are no springs and there is nothing odd about the weights, so I think the weights which Bessler allowed to be examined were wrapped a handkerchief for two reasons, firstly they were greasy and secondly it added to the mystique surrounding the whole event. Mine are simple lead discs with a hole through the centre. I can put several on one bolt to produce the desired weight.
JC
