On 6th June, 1712, in Germany, Johann Bessler (also known by his pseudonym, Orffyreus) announced that after many years of failure, he had succeeded in designing and building a perpetual motion machine. For more than fourteen years he exhibited his machine and allowed people to thoroughly examine the outside of it, but it’s internal workings were kept hidden. This was because the inventor feared that his design would be copied and someone else might obtain credit for all his years of hard work looking for the solution. He followed the advice from the famous scientist, Gottfried Leibniz, who was able to examine the device, and recommended a number of demonstrations and tests designed to prove the validity of his machine without giving away the secret of its design.

A blog about Johann Bessler and the Orffyreus Code and my efforts to decipher it. I'll comment on things connected with it and anything I think might be of interest to anyone else.
The ‘Bessler’s Books’ button at the top of the right side panel, will take you to a page giving access to all Bessler’s books. Simply click ‘home’ to come back to my blog.
Note the copyright notice.
Monday, 8 May 2023
Johann Bessler aka Orffyreus and his Perpetual Motion Machine
Thursday, 4 May 2023
Gravity Enabled Continuously Rotating Electricity Generator
There are a small group of people wide spread around the world, who believe that Johann Bessler’s claim that he had invented a so-called Perpetual Motion machines was genuine. But most people’s first opinion is to dismiss such declarations with little further consideration, and it’s not surprising, given the current school of thought about such assertions.
Despite the certainty that the educational institutions have established in their curriculums, teaching the young and old alike that Johann Bessler was a fraud, there are a number of questions which are routinely dismissed or ignored, but which need to be properly examined in a fair and unbiased fashion to determine the truth about his machine. Why? Because those questions raise serious doubts about the consensus of opinion that any kind of machine such as Bessler’s was or is impossible
The inventor never gave up on his contention that his machine was genuine and he declared that if he was found to have been cheating then he should be executed for it. You might think that such an end was unlikely but actually several people making claims to take advantage of one or more members of the ruling class were indeed summarily executed by having their head chopped off.
Early on during his initial exhibitions, his claim to have invented and exhibited a perpetual motion machine caused a considerable amount of interest within certain court circles among the intellectuals who inhabited that elite society. Numerous letters between several witnesses who attended Bessler’s demonstrations sparked the interest of Gottfried Leibniz. He managed to arrange two private demonstrations where he was able to ask several questions and examine the wheel and its motion. He came to believe that here was a great invention which should not be lost because of the scepticism generally advanced in reaction to the demonstrations.
Following his advice and help, Bessler was ordered to bring his machine to the court of Karl, the Landgrave of Hesse. Karl had spent some considerable time funding the experiments of Denis Papin and subsequent to his departure for London, Karl agreed to provide Bessler with rooms to exhibit his new and larger machine. Of course Karl insisted on being allowed to confirm the inventor’s claims by examining the workings of the machine which he did. He concluded that the machine was genuine and remarkably simple. He was a man of tremendous prestige being held in high regard and had a reputation for honesty and sincerity throughout Europe. This coupled with his interest and knowledge of the latest discoveries in the world of science made him the ideal person to offer Bessler his patronage
Following Leibniz’s recommendations, Bessler developed a series of demonstrations which were designed to provide firm, convincing evidence that Bessler’s wheel was genuine. The most obvious one required a continuous run of around two weeks under lock and key and the Landgrave’s personal seal. A guard was also placed outside the room for the full period of the run, which was actually extended to 54 days in total.
Other measures designed to reduce the chance of fraud, included providing two alternate sets of pillars supporting the wheel, to enable the device to be moved from set to the other. This allowed the examiners to check both sets of bearings before and after translocation had taken place. Nothing suspicious was ever found. An Archimedes pump was attached to the wheel to demonstrate how it could pump water if needed. A chest of stones weighting 70 pounds was hoisted by the wheel from the castle yard to its roof and lowered many times.
Many have tried to find a way that Bessler might have faked the demonstrations, but no secret method has ever been found, and the truth is there for anyone capable of objective analysis to examine the evidence - to see if it was impossible to fake or impossible to be real!
Current research suggests that although a perpetual motion machine in an isolated system is impossible, where there is an external force field there must be a way to tap this force continuously for as long as that force exists. Bessler states very clearly that his machine relied completely on the action of some weights thus propounding the force of gravity.
This suggested solution is customarily dismissed because gravity is a force and not a source of energy. However thousands of waterwheels and hydroelectric power stations are enabled to work due to the force of gravity. The argument that a fallen weight has to be lifted once it’s fallen is used to dismiss Bessler’s wheel, but if Bessler managed to contrive a method which overcame that problem, then his machine was indeed the real deal. Obviously he must have succeeded so there is a potential solution to global warming with free, clean energy.
What are we waiting for!
JC
Saturday, 29 April 2023
Johann Bessler’s Tilted Pentagram.
One of the curious features of the pentagram embedded in the Weissenstein wheel shown in Johann Bessler’s Das Triumphans book, (and at the top of my blog) is that it is slightly tilted. Given that he provides a strong indication that the pentagram is deliberate by including two of Euclid’s pentagram construction steps within the illustration, how come it ended up tilted?
In the illustration below I’ve shown the Weissenstein wheel with Euclid’s 11th proposition, next to it which ran thus::-
“To inscribe an equilateral and equiangular pentagon in a given circle….”
Below I refer to the padlock line (blue) which follows the diameter of the wheel. I also use the rope line (red) which shows the path of the rope which actually passes behind the wheel.
By including the padlock line (blue) which clearly bisects the angle of 36 degrees formed by CAD at the point where the rope line (in red) meets the padlock line, implies that the result was deliberate and therefore for him to produce a tilted pentagram, either he introduced a deliberate error, or he deliberately included it as another clue towards an eventual solution. He emphasised the precision of the pentagram by drawing attention to the base of the triangle where it overlies a succession of hatching lines which are perfectly aligned with it.
Of course he might just have drawn the rope line in the wrong place or at the wrong angle, that could create a tilted pentagram; but given his skills in drawing, measuring etc, that is too unlikely to consider.
Knowing Bessler and his habit of including more than one solution to each clue, I’m sure that he tilted the pentagram for a reason. The rope line should form an angle of 54 degrees with the central pillar upright, 54 being an multiple of 18 degrees like every angle in the pentagram, but it is hard to be sure if it hits that angle. I considered that he might have altered the angle to 55 degrees but such a small difference would be easily missed missed and I concluded that he didn’t.
I tried many times over the years to make the pentagram sit straight with the upper chord exactly horizontal, but failed and it wasn’t until I discovered a second clue which explained how and why the pentagram had a tilt. I’ll explain why it’s tilted in my next blog, next week.
I’m away up north with my granddaughter Amy until the next week. She’s just hit 3.5 million followers, amy pohl on TikTok.
JC
Saturday, 22 April 2023
Is This the Real Solution to Climate Change? Yes, Absolutely!
The Legend of Johann Bessler’s Perpetual Motion Machine.
Did Bessler’s Perpetual Motion Machine Arrive Before ItsTime?
There has been some discussion about the potential power available from Bessler’s wheel. Comparisons have been made between the Merseburg w...
-
It's not that unlikely. In the 1870s, two inventors, Elisha Gray and Alexander Graham Bell, both independently designed devices that c...
-
On 6th June, 1712, in Germany, Johann Bessler (also known by his pseudonym, Orffyreus) announced that after many years of failure, he had s...
-
When someone finds the solution to Bessler’s wheel I don’t know how, or even if, it will affect the world we live in, but I do know that con...