I was reading, yet again, how the force of gravity cannot possibly be a source of energy. It's not just the world at large who refuse to accept the argument that gravity can be tapped, there are many members of the Besslerwheel Forum who also subscribe to that view. And yet they can only posit the possibility that there must have been some additional source of energy which Bessler discovered and which we must be able to use as well.
So perhaps we should look at the reason why gravity can be used as an enabler of continuous rotation .
Almost 2500 years ago, Plato insisted that with inert matter in motion, because it is not the cause of its own motion; its motion requires a moving cause different from itself. This moving cause cannot itself be of such kind that it also requires to be moved from without. To put it another way There must be an unmoved mover, or 'that which moves without being moved'.
A prime mover (Latin: primum movens) is a concept advanced by Plato's best student, Aristotle, as a primary cause (or first uncaused cause) or "mover" of all the motion in the universe. He wrote, 'as is implicit in the name, the "unmoved mover" moves other things, but is not itself moved by any prior action.
He wrote, 'if it is true that when A is in motion there must be some B that moves A, then if B is itself in motion there must be some C moving B, and so on. This series cannot go on forever, and so it must come to a halt in some X that is a cause of motion but does not move itself—an unmoved mover. Oddly, Aristotle is venturing close to describing a perpetual motion, which he implies is impossible within the context of his argument.
Briefly, then, there has to be an initiator of motion, or ‘first cause of all the motion in
the universe’.
"The unmoved mover”, moves other things but
is not itself moved by any other prior action. We know of only one unmoving mover - gravity.
So primum movens or primum mobile referred to by Bessler and used in conjuction with his statement that the weights in his machine are the actual cause of his perpetual motion, must apply to the action of gravity upon his machine, and be the sole cause of its rotation.
Gravity is an unmoved mover. The source or initiator of every other movement in the universe can be traced back to the effect of gravity. It is not regarded as an energy source because it is a conservative force. A conservative force is a force with the property that the work done in moving a particle between two points is independent of the path taken. The gravitational force is conservative because the work done by the gravitational force on an object depends only on its change in height.
Because gravity is indentified as a conservative force and because its work done in moving a particle between two points is independent of the path taken, it is understood to rule out gravity driven continuously turning wheels - such as Bessler's. We know that Besser's wheel was not a closed system, therefore it had access to an external force. There is no other 'unmoved mover' force in the universe as far as we know, therefore the only force which fits the bill is gravity.
Notice how we repeatedly state that gravity does do work. If it does work it consumes energy, but that energy is limitless, so although it expends energy, it never runs out. It is perpetual, so now we have a force which apparently consumes energy and does work and does not exhaust its energy supply. If that does not decribe a force which can supply endless energy, I don't know what is.
Notice how we repeatedly state that gravity does do work. If it does work it consumes energy, but that energy is limitless, so although it expends energy, it never runs out. It is perpetual, so now we have a force which apparently consumes energy and does work and does not exhaust its energy supply. If that does not decribe a force which can supply endless energy, I don't know what is.
If we could find other conservative forces which drive mechanical motors then we might understand why Bessler's wheel worked. Wind pressure and water pressure are conservative forces which drive mechanical motors, but they move, due to various causes among them, gravity.
We know the point of interaction between gravity and the wheel; it is the weights. They are doing the same job as air molecules do with windmills, and water molecules do with water wheels. or hydro-electric dams. The weights do the job of interacting between gravity and the wheel, causing it to rotate continuously, if the configuraton is correct.
I will be posting my own thoughts on this as soon as my wheel has been finished and tested - working or not.
Please share the following link and donate if you wish to aid my granddaughter's treatment.
www.helpamy.co.uk/
JC
I will be posting my own thoughts on this as soon as my wheel has been finished and tested - working or not.
Please share the following link and donate if you wish to aid my granddaughter's treatment.
www.helpamy.co.uk/
JC