Having spent three weeks away recently, I was looking forward to returning to work on my latest version of Bessler's wheel, but this intention has been thwarted by several illnesses in my family. My family comes first so I have managed to spend less than half an hour there, since before the Christmas holidays.. I had hoped to prove my design for my own satisfaction very soon but it looks as though it will have to wait.
This is a little frustrating for me as I wanted to get the model tested before completing it. How can I test an incomplete model? I think that if two mechanism work as I predict they will, then the rest is plain sailing. I just have to complete the other mechanisms.
One of my recurring concerns is reading about other people's theories about what this or that clue meant. The authors sound so confident and yet when I read about how this or that design is supposed to fit in with this or that clue etc, part of me wants to show them the errors they are making, because I know how it is supposed to work.
I understand that everyone has their own pet theories and there can't be two which apply equally if they are different, so why should mine be any more likely to lead to the correct solution? I made a major discovery, possibly as long as two years ago now, and yet I have only recently worked out how to apply it and that after several false starts. I made this important discovery and subsequently found out exactly what Bessler was intending to convey in his various clues. Finding further support for my conclusions became a matter of rereading everything, relating what I found to the clues themselves. This being so I am unceasingly surprised at claims similar to mine but which are clearly no way the same as mine. I read their explanation and the temptation to show them why they are so far off the correct interpretation is difficult to resist. But perhaps it is me who has got the wrong end of the stick, or is it the other guy, or are we both wrong?
What I do know, and this is the vaguest of clues, Scott Ellis founder of the Bessler wheel forum put me on the right track many years ago although I did not recognise it until recently.
For what it's worth, I do not find anything of value in designs for Bessler's wheel which include the use of springs, magnets or temperature variations, I am satisfied that it all hangs on gravity and it will be shown that there is no conflict with the laws of physics. In fact it has to be gravity and it can't break any physical laws.
My feeling is that my understanding is correct and everyone else is wrong. It’s very hard to be a lone voice in the wilderness, as we all are. It’s difficult to feel, know, and speak your truth and be greeted by either the dull thud of indifference or the resounding bellow of opposition, scorn and even anger.
The way you respond says a lot about your character. Do you fold up, shut down, or otherwise retreat from speaking your truth? Do you fight back until you wear yourself out? Do you try to prove that what you are saying is right, and that what everyone else is saying is wrong? But one thing is clear: if the upstart perpetual motionists prove to be right, and the others were wrong, what a day of celebration! So despite opposition and competition I shall continue to seek the solution until I succeed.
May this be an inspiration to you.
JC
10a2c5d26e15f6g7h10ik12l3m6n14o14r5s17tu6v5w4y4-3,’.
This is a little frustrating for me as I wanted to get the model tested before completing it. How can I test an incomplete model? I think that if two mechanism work as I predict they will, then the rest is plain sailing. I just have to complete the other mechanisms.
One of my recurring concerns is reading about other people's theories about what this or that clue meant. The authors sound so confident and yet when I read about how this or that design is supposed to fit in with this or that clue etc, part of me wants to show them the errors they are making, because I know how it is supposed to work.
I understand that everyone has their own pet theories and there can't be two which apply equally if they are different, so why should mine be any more likely to lead to the correct solution? I made a major discovery, possibly as long as two years ago now, and yet I have only recently worked out how to apply it and that after several false starts. I made this important discovery and subsequently found out exactly what Bessler was intending to convey in his various clues. Finding further support for my conclusions became a matter of rereading everything, relating what I found to the clues themselves. This being so I am unceasingly surprised at claims similar to mine but which are clearly no way the same as mine. I read their explanation and the temptation to show them why they are so far off the correct interpretation is difficult to resist. But perhaps it is me who has got the wrong end of the stick, or is it the other guy, or are we both wrong?
What I do know, and this is the vaguest of clues, Scott Ellis founder of the Bessler wheel forum put me on the right track many years ago although I did not recognise it until recently.
For what it's worth, I do not find anything of value in designs for Bessler's wheel which include the use of springs, magnets or temperature variations, I am satisfied that it all hangs on gravity and it will be shown that there is no conflict with the laws of physics. In fact it has to be gravity and it can't break any physical laws.
My feeling is that my understanding is correct and everyone else is wrong. It’s very hard to be a lone voice in the wilderness, as we all are. It’s difficult to feel, know, and speak your truth and be greeted by either the dull thud of indifference or the resounding bellow of opposition, scorn and even anger.
The way you respond says a lot about your character. Do you fold up, shut down, or otherwise retreat from speaking your truth? Do you fight back until you wear yourself out? Do you try to prove that what you are saying is right, and that what everyone else is saying is wrong? But one thing is clear: if the upstart perpetual motionists prove to be right, and the others were wrong, what a day of celebration! So despite opposition and competition I shall continue to seek the solution until I succeed.
May this be an inspiration to you.
JC
10a2c5d26e15f6g7h10ik12l3m6n14o14r5s17tu6v5w4y4-3,’.
