I think we are due for a sea change or should that be a paradigm shift? A paradigm shift occurs when axioms, long trusted as self-evident truths, gradually get weakened by contradictory evidence previously ignored as being anomalous. The result usually involves a new way of thinking which accommodates the anomalies. A sea change, in modern parlance, tends to indicate a complete change from what was thought to be true in the past, but it seems to be more of a transformation than a change.
It seems to me that there is an elephant in the room! If an elephant was in a room it would be impossible to overlook; thus, people in the room who pretend the elephant is not there have chosen to avoid dealing with a looming big issue. There are certain inescapable facts attached to the Bessler legend which are ignored or circumvented, the result of which is that the possibility of using gravity as an energy source has been dismissed.
One, Karl the Landgrave of Hesse-Kassel validated the wheel. It is inconceivable that he would be involved in fraud.
Two, no evidence of fraud was ever found, and Bessler never stopped declaring his innocence.
Three, Bessler stated that "these weights are themselves the PM device, the ‘essential constituent parts’s".
Four, there are no other forces sufficient in either speed or strength, to react quickly enough or strongly enough to assist gravity in turning the wheel.
Conclusion, Bessler's wheel was enabled to turn by the force of gravity alone.
So let us suppose that the wheel was genuine and it depended on gravity alone. We are told gravity is a conservative force and therefore incapable of supporting continuous rotation. Why should that be so? Wind is conservative, so is a stream, but they support continuous rotation. I used to liken the action of gravity to the wind, or a stream of water but people get too hung up on where the wind comes from, what causes it, the action of the sun etc., to consider the implications of that fact.
I think the sun is not the ultimate cause of the wind, gravity is. Air can be warmed by volcanic action or man's actions so not necessarily the sun, but gravity is essential.
I think the sun is not the ultimate cause of the wind, gravity is. Air can be warmed by volcanic action or man's actions so not necessarily the sun, but gravity is essential.
The passage of air molecules (mainly a mixture of nitrogen oxygen and carbon dioxide) from a higher pressure area to a lower one, is discerned as wind. The lower pressure air results when its molecules are warmed and it expands and rises, leaving the surround molecules to rush into the potential vacuum which would result. When the air warms it expands and becomes less dense. The higher you go the thinner the air becomes until there isn't enough to breathe. Why is that? The simple reason is that the air is subject to gravity the same as everything else is.
Air close to the surface of the earth is at its densest with the molecules most tightly packed together. When warmed the molecules move further apart so become less dense. They also rise, squeezed upwards by the denser cooler air at ground level.
In Bessler’s wheel the lead weights were composed of lead molecules. It doesn't change shape unless heated to melting point so when used as a weight it is uniformly heavy unlike the more volatile air molecules. Gravity lies at the heart of the motion of the air molecules and the sun is only responsible for warming them. Without the action of gravity on our atmosphere there wouldn't be any wind - there wouldn't be any air either!. Gravity enables the air molecules to move continuously creating the air currents which drive windmills. And it’s gravity that enables the weights in Bessler’s wheel to rotate it continuously.
The air molecules which, in the wind drive the windmill and in the lead weights can drive the gravitywheel,.are each driven by the force of gravity.
The air molecules which, in the wind drive the windmill and in the lead weights can drive the gravitywheel,.are each driven by the force of gravity.
JC