Monday, 14 January 2019

If Johann Bessler had Sold his Perpetual Motion Machine.

I wonder what changes might have occured to the world in which we live if Bessler had sold his machine.  There were only two potential purchasers; the first being Karl the Landgrave of Hesse-Kassel, and the other, Peter the Great, Czar of Russia.  There was a third, the Baron Anton von Mannsberg, Bessler’s landlord in later years, who ordered the inventor to build another copy of his machine, but once again circumstances beyond his control prevented the examination of the model and it was finally lost to us.

Karl was a clever man, intensely interested in the latest discoveries in science theory and fact.  He financed research into astronomy and numerous other areas of the burgeoning field of scientific investigation, as well as his steam experiments with Denis Papin. Despite his initial interest in Bessler's machine he was more interested in Newcomen’s steam engine and I think he knew Bessler’s wheel would not do to pump water up the 300 metres necessary to feed the cascade. The fact that Newcomen's machine would not have coped either,  was probably realised quite quickly as reservoirs for collecting water at the top of the hill were planned before his death and they are still functioning today.

But Peter, the Czar, was another who looked into the future and sought help in every field of science and technology.  He was on his way to examine Bessler’s wheel when he died. Professor Christian Wolff had been invited to St Petersburg to head up the university recently founded by Peter and one of Wolff’s requirements was that he be involved in developing Bessler’s wheel.  So both potential purchasers failed to complete.

Peter was the best chance of securing the machine for future generations and would have succeeded in developing a useful version with Wolff's help.  Despite the much more powerful machine designed and built by Thomas Newcomen, Bessler's wheel was so much cheaper and more easily constructed, and given the poor state of technology in Russia at that time, it is likely that Bessler's machine would have thrived. During the subsequent 300 years it is inconceivable that new uses and developments would not have ocurred.

Elsewhere, the year 1701 saw the opening of the Navigation School in tMoscow; in 1715 it was moved to St. Petersburg, where it became the foundation for the Navy Academy. Later it was followed with Engineering, Artillery and Medical schools.

The St. Petersburg Academy opened on the initiative of Peter I in 1725 and played a great role in formation and development of the Russian science.  Originally the Academy was mostly based on foreign scientists such as Professor Christian Wolff, who were willing to work in Russia.

It is clear that Bessler's machine would have become something of a workhorse in areas unsuited to the development of the much more complex Newcomen machine.  But what if any, form would it take today and for what purpose?

I would have thought that given the introduction of electricity to Russia in 1876, when the first power station was built, and in 1879 electric street lighting was installed in St. Petersburg, (only a year or two after the the USA, France and England), it would not have taken long for the same development process which was happening around the world, to have taken place in Russia too.

Who knows what additional uses might have been discovered which might have pushed some of the later inventions into a lower position iin the world of technology?

I don't wish to go over old ground too often but here are a few of my previous blog referring to alternative used for Bessler's wheel.

Friday, 27 July 2018                   

Wednesday, 30 March 2016

Friday, 6 March 2015

Thursday, 2 August 2012

Wednesday, 16 November 2011

Friday, 15 January 2010

JC

11 comments:

  1. If Bessler sold his machine, It would still be in the depths of an undisclosed warehouses, dismantled, and boxed up tight in a governmental paranoid conspiracy.

    ReplyDelete
  2. John, did you mean Baron Anton von Mansberg (Or even Mannsberg) rather than Baron Anton von Landberg?

    I think think the changes today would be most prominent in fundamental physics. As John Nash said: «We don’t REALLY understand what is happening, what the ultimate truth really is - John Nash on Quantum Mechanics.

    And Edward Witten on fundamental physics understanding: «The problem in physics today is that all is based on two different theories (quantum and relativity). But when we mix them together, it all becomes just nonsense».

    I think Bessler's wheel would have solved many of those last puzzles that we will for ever miss without really knowing where energy, matter dark energy etc. all comes from.. The creation process.. MAybe even the basic building brics of our universe and existence. I believe We would be closer an answer to the fundamental question.. The creation...versus religion../ "God".

    Even Bessler compared his machine to the work of God. Only his principle and God was able to create energy out of dead materials, as he himself said it..

    ReplyDelete
  3. If you put the Word Nature in the place of God, I think we are close to a correct picture. Bessler's secret principle is a part of the basics of nature that make everything able to come into existence without a God! True Nature must overcome Zero, or else it wouldn't exist in the first place. This secret is what we call "God", and some call it "Big Bang". I believe Bessler's secret holds the key to the real answer..

    Best ØR

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you Øystein, I’d like to say that I make a point of including one typo in each blog, but it wouldn’t be true! Mansberg yes.

      JC

      Delete
  4. The simplicity that he talked about would have made the machine available to all. I believe he also stated that when he had one mechanism or crossbar, that the machine would just barely turn on its own, but as he added more then it would make power. So, it would lend itself, with any easy jump to conclude the number of mechanisms is not important, because it would run on just one.

    ReplyDelete
  5. RAF Great and valuable comment Gravittea---I agree. Remember, a carpenter's "boy"could make one after briefly seeing it! Thanks also Gravittea for your insightful statement 21 Dec.at 16:12. I wish you well on our continuing quest!

    ReplyDelete
  6. The hardest work of all is overcoming your own prejudice when you assume you know the most simplest of levers you've blinded yourself to a universe of possibilities

    ReplyDelete
  7. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Although therapy has become more tolerable and once daily FDC tables have made it easier to adhere to prescribed treatment, it still requires that patients take their medication regularly to achieve sustained viral suppression. When treatment adherence is inadequate and replication is therefore not suppressed, But dr itua promised and fulfilled his promised to me as he said I will share his work to people that are suffering from Infertility, Herpes, Hepatitis A/B, Fibroid, HIV/ Aids, Alzheimer's disease, Arthritis, Copd, Diabetes, Liver/Kidney Inflamotry, Fibromyalgia, Parkinson's disease, I have read a lot of testimony online from Jesus McKinney,Achima Abelard and Tara Omar on how dr itua heal them with his herbal medicine I contacted him on Email drituaherbalcenter@gmail.com then we talk on whatsapp +2348149277967 he gave me instruction on how to drink it for two weeks then after drinking it for two weeks I went for test then I find out I was cured of HIV, I thank him allot i also send him some money for appreciation, Contact this great herbal doctor if you are a sick person.

    ReplyDelete

The Metaphors in Johann Bessler’s Apologia Poetica, Chapter XLVI

There is an intriguing passage in Apologia Poetica which has been the subject of much debate.  Most of the book is written rhyming couplets...